my take on things - comments about all the world and his brother
Published on February 11, 2010 By utemia In Movie Reviews

Recently I watched this little treasure *cough* with my 9, 6 and 4 year old nephews and niece. Has any of you watched this film? It is _NOT_ for children - at all. The plot has murder in it, tons of violence like attempted burning of villagers inside their own house, a merciless hunt for Esmeralda with the accompanying burning down of Paris, a song where Claude Frollo sings about hell and damnation and his obcession with Esmeralda and why he wants to kill her, all painted in red and with flames.

A lot of the score is based on "dies irae" which means days of wrath. Dies irae is a mideaval hymn and has  been used in other movies as well, like in The seventh seal (Ingmar Bergman made this movie in 1957).

Victor Hugo wrote a historic story for adults about mideaval Paris with serious and also dark themes like inquisition, executions, obcession, madness, love, religion and tragedy - why Disney had to take this story and turn into an animated motion picture where the only highlight were talking gargoyles I'll never know. Don't watch this film with your children, they'll have nightmares afterwards. It was rated G here, it should be at least PG 13 or even R.

This is a movie for adults because the plot is dark and violent, and the humerous and lighthearted intermissions can't really make up for that. Movies for children can have serious themes and sad story elements (like in the Lion King when papa lion is killed by the stampede caused by his own brother - the fratricide was pretty well disguised in the plot come to think of it) but not like this. Lion King was mainly a coming of age sort of story while The Hunchback is a tragedy from the outset. The whole film starts with a murder of a young mother and attempted murder of a baby for crying out loud - not something that I would confront a 6 year old with. Welll, that is all I have to say about that.


Comments
on Feb 11, 2010

I can honestly say I have not seen it.  But then your review makes me want to.  I do agree with you that it does not appear suitable for young children, so I am unsure why Disney would be trying to market it to them.  But I do know the Victor Hugo work and if it at least stays true to the author (unlike some of Disney's other recent fair like Pocahontas), it is probably not a bad adult movie. (Not XXX Adult)

on Feb 11, 2010

It's not a bad movie at all, just not a movie for children. Cute little doves don't do much to mitigate the violence and humiliation that follow when Quasimodo joins the festivities and is elected king of fools for example.

The plot stays relatively close to the original - of course the story is modified somewhat as it always happens when books are turned into movies and mainly concentrates on Quasimodo's storyline. It is always difficult to transform an epos to 90 minutes of film. I know many examples where that resulted in really really stupid films like for example the movie "The scarlet letter" with Demi Moore. The book is great but the film is not depicting the same story as in the book. Everything was romanticised and hollywoodized to fit a certain profile with a really awful result. "The scarlet Letter" by N Hawthorne isn't a lovestory after all but a critique on the puritans and the cruelty, ignorance and fanaticism of their society. Anyway..

I didn't read nor watch Pocahontas so I can't compare those two. Or maybe I did see it because now I remember some dim pictues about a talking raccoon.. lol.

A XXX Disney movie would be a sight to see though haha can you imagine Bambi doing the nasty in the woods? lol Sorry for the image

on Feb 12, 2010

We've heard the same thing from folks here.  We don't have any littlies around the house anymore, not permanently, so we don't take many to movies.  But we do have a bunch of grandkids and we try to be careful about what they see when they are here.  The whole thing reminds me of a time many years ago when we took our small boys to see "Young Frankenstein"...a Gene Wilder comedy that was hilarious.  On the way out to the car I asked my four-year old number two son what he had thought of it and with chin and voice trembling he said, "That was the scariest movie I ever saw!"  Yep, parents gotta be careful what they let the kiddies watch.

on Feb 12, 2010

Well the good thing was that my little relatives weren't paying that much attention because they wanted the movie to be over so they could finish watching Mary Poppins which they had started in the morning - for the 50th time. Now that is an amazing movie for kids (and grownups). New to that collection came "Chitty Chitty Bang Bang" last christmas - maybe I should get them the Wizzard of OZ as a gift next time I see them.

 

on Feb 12, 2010

utemia
I didn't read nor watch Pocahontas so I can't compare those two. Or maybe I did see it because now I remember some dim pictues about a talking raccoon.. lol.

Yea that was probably it.  LOL.  But Pocahontas is not a book in the traditional sense, but history (and told in many histories).  It just destroyed the actual truth of it in search of the cute racoons and beavers for a children's movie.  As pure fiction, it was cute.

 

Big Fat Daddy
"Young Frankenstein"...a Gene Wilder comedy that was hilarious.  On the way out to the car I asked my four-year old number two son what he had thought of it and with chin and voice trembling he said, "That was the scariest movie I ever saw!"  Yep, parents gotta be careful what they let the kiddies watch.

My favorite all time movie!  But definitly not for children.  WHile I think the movie was made very well, the sexual innuendo would be hard to explain to a child.  I figure when they are in their teens they may get it, but it is more an adult movie in the sense the humor would probably be lost on most children and teens.

Eye-gore!